Too many important things have undergone a radical change. For instance, the indissolubility of the bond in the sacrament of marriage: a permanent bond which has been established by Divine Law, and thus believed and upheld for twenty centuries without the slightest doubt or exception. Today, on the contrary, divorce is profusely practiced within the Catholic Church, as if it were something perfectly natural and convenient. Of course, the term “divorce” is not used – it could not possibly be, since Divine Law and more than twenty centuries of ecclesiastical practice are involved here –; instead it is referred to as an official declaration of non-existence or nullity of the bond. There was not a valid bond at the moment of the celebration of the marriage in question; therefore, one can consider that there was no valid sacrament. From this point of view, it could seem that one is treading here upon the paths of legitimacy and normalcy; but problems immediately arise the very moment one begins to reflect on this issue. Is it enough to change the name of an institution – divorce, in this case – to hide it from view, in spite of the fact that its essence and existence remain intact? The same has occurred in this profane world with issues like abortion, which, for instance, is now referred to as an interruption of pregnancy (many other very well-known examples could be brought in here).