That a Bishop dares to defend the Faith, of all things, and is left alone without anybody following him and supporting him is an old story within the Church. Sometimes such a Bishop is not only abandoned but also viciously persecuted and, if possible, destroyed. This is something that has seemingly become customary in the Church. The story of Saint Athanasius, Bishop of Alexandria in the 4th century, invincible champion in the struggle against the Arian heresy, imprisoned and expelled from his See as many as five times, repeats itself throughout the history of the Church even up till today.
Nowadays, everybody knows the case of Most Reverend Rogelio Liviares, Bishop of Ciudad del Este, Paraguay. His ministry as Bishop is well known, which dispenses us from entering into any details. The Episcopal Conference of Paraguay was the very accusing finger pointed at the unfortunate Prelate (the lives and miracles of the members of the Episcopal Conference are also quite notorious) as if he were somewhat less than a criminal.
Nevertheless, something in this whole affair calls our attention most powerfully. The Government of the Prelature Opus Dei (of which Bishop Liviares is a member) quickly distanced itself from him and his declaration of obedience to Tradition and his exhortations to his seminarians to be faithful to it and to maintain his obedient attitude.
Stupidity is the only thing in which man can emulate Divine Being in regard to His Infinity.
The old Vulgate Bible said that the number of fools is infinite; this is how Saint Jerome translated this passage. This text is modified in the modern versions of the Bible which began to appear toward the second half of the 20th century. One can read quite a different text in the Neo-Vulgate version, a revision mandated by the Second Vatican Council: Quod est curvum, rectum fieri non potest; et, quod deficiens est, numerari non potest, which some translate as what is twisted cannot be straightened, what is not there cannot be counted; quite different from the Jeromian original. Modern exegetes will provide us with multiple explanations about current biblical studies, etc., which we, mere mortals, will not challenge. At any rate, we can rest assured, for this is such an obvious statement that we do not need the Bible to tell us so. In effect, anyone can easily realize that the number of fools is infinite.
Those of us who were young toward the middle of the past century were astounded at what used to be said then, namely that since the United States of America was still a young country, its History textbooks did not have enough material for lucubration; therefore, it was small wonder they devoted several chapters to describing the appearance and the biography of the dog of the doctor of Abraham Lincoln. We can safely assume that this was an exaggerated account in the mouth of some people; nevertheless, it is also possible that future generations will think it an exaggeration when they hear that in these days more than a hundred thousand people gathered in Madrid to protest the termination (for obvious security reasons) of the dog of the nurse infected with ebola virus. As anyone can understand, the demise of this dog is the most serious problem today in Spain (all other problems have not deserved the slightest voice of protest). The word is going around that the Spaniards have lost their mind; a statement that would have been endorsed by Aristotle himself if he were alive.